Lyft Class Action Lawsuit (2023)
Our attorneys are pursuing a Lyft class action lawsuit on behalf of California, Massachusetts, and Illinois drivers who were improperly classified as “independent contractors” when they should be entitled to the rights of “employees”. We have also represented hundreds of Lyft drivers in individual arbitrations.
If Lyft drivers were employees, under for example California labor law, they would be entitled to guaranteed earnings of at least $15 per hour, 100% of tips, and reimbursement for all mileage (at a rate of up to 58 cents per gallon).
Lyft may have misclassified you to avoid paying you what it owes under your state’s labor laws. Contact us today for a free consultation.
Past Lyft Class Action Settlement and Payouts
In 2017, a federal judge approved a $27 million class action settlement between Lyft and its California drivers, who alleged that they had been misclassified as “independent contractors.” The judge had previously rejected a proposed $12 million settlement because he felt it “short changed” drivers. The judge cautioned, however, that:
The agreement is not perfect. And the status of Lyft drivers under California law remains uncertain going forward.
The lawsuit, which was originally filed in 2013, provided expected payouts to Lyft drivers of up to $8,000, depending on how many hours they drove for Lyft per week, and how many total hours they drove, according to the settlement website.
In addition to payouts, the settlement also provided non-monetary relief. According to the settlement website, the class settlement:
- Prohibited Lyft from deactivating drivers without providing a reason, and limited the permissible reasons that Lyft could use to a pre-defined list;
- Required Lyft to add an option to allow customers to “favorite” a driver;
- Required Lyft to provide additional information to Lyft drivers about prospective customers before accepting the ride.
Other Class Action Lawsuits against Lyft
Numerous class action lawsuits have been filed against Lyft on behalf of drivers that say they’ve been misclassified. In some cases, courts have ordered the drivers to arbitrate their disputes on an individual basis, because the drivers — when they signed up — checked a box saying they waived their right to participate in a class action and agreed to arbitrate their claims with Lyft on an individual basis.
In another lawsuit, a Lyft driver sued Uber, alleging that Uber had instructed some of its drivers to request bogus Lyft rides, sending its competitor’s drivers in the area on a “wild goose chase” looking for rides that did not exist (they were really Uber drivers requesting fake rides). When this Lyft driver sued Uber, the company argued that the Lyft driver was bound by an arbitration clause with Uber. But a California appeals court held that the dispute did not need to be arbitrated and could proceed in court.
How to sue Lyft
The legal landscape against Lyft is uncertain. Some cases against Lyft may be filed in court, whereas others must be filed in arbitration. And misclassification law in California and other states is changing rapidly. California, for example, is considering a new law, Assembly Bill 5 (AB5), which could require Lyft to reclassify its workers as “employees,” providing them with guaranteed minimum wage, overtime, mileage reimbursement, sick pay, and other benefits and protections of California’s employment laws.
To best understand how to sue Lyft — for example what forum to sue in; whether you can file as a class action; and whether the underlying labor laws are favorable to you, you should consult a knowledgeable attorney.
Attorneys for Lyft Driver Lawsuits
Steven specializes in employment litigation and has been lead or co-lead counsel on several cases that resulted in settlements of over $1 million.View full profile
Aaron represents consumers, employees, and whistleblowers in class actions and other complex litigation.View full profile
Ashleigh represents consumers and employees in class actions and mass arbitration involving consumer protection and employment law.View full profile