California Borrowers Refile Class Action Lawsuit Against Cashcall

March 15, 2019

Lawsuit Follows Landmark California Supreme Court Decision on the Unconscionability of High Interest Rate Long Term Loans

A class action lawsuit has been refiled in San Mateo Superior Court against CashCall, an online lender accused of preying on low-income, vulnerable consumers in California with its $2,600 “signature loan.”   The signature loan, which was issued to more than 135,000 low-income borrowers between August 2005 and July 2011, featured interest rates ranging from 96% to 135% for repayment periods of three and a half years and more. The lawsuit, De La Torre v. CashCall, was filed on March 7, 2019 by the Sturdevant Law Firm, the Law Office of Arthur D. Levy, Gibbs Law Group, Rukin Hyland & Riggin and the Law Offices of Damon M. Connolly.

The newly-filed complaint alleges that CashCall’s $2,600 loans are unconscionable because of the combination of loan interest rate, length of the loan repayment schedule, and the amount of monthly payments.  In order to repay such a loan, a borrower had to pay 3.6 to 4.3 times the principal amount over the life of the loan, amounting to more than $9,184 for a $2,525 loan at 96% and $10,918 at 135%.  CashCall is alleged to have collected hundreds of millions of dollars in interest payments from borrowers on loans made during the class period, despite its known 45% default rate.

The original lawsuit, which was filed and litigated by the same attorneys, resulted in a landmark, unanimous decision by the California Supreme Court in August 2018, holding that high interest rates alone could render loans unconscionable under California Law. De La Torre v. CashCall, Inc. (2018) 5 Cal.5th 966.   This decision is especially important because it is the first case to both interpret and explain the California Legislature’s intention to protect targeted, vulnerable Californians from gross overreaching by online consumer lenders like CashCall.  Going forward, all such loans—used autos, unsecured small money and other loans—will be subject to judicial scrutiny.

Jim Sturdevant, one of the lead attorneys who argued the case before the high Court, said:

This is a huge, overdue victory for thousands of low-income Californians who have been targeted by lenders like CashCall,

Steven Tindall of Gibbs Law Group added:

We look forward to continuing to advocate for those borrowers through our lawsuit, and we intend to hold CashCall accountable for the harm it caused so many people with its predatory products.

Consumers who were affected or would like to learn more about their legal rights in the CashCall lawsuit may visit our webpage or contact Jim Sturdevant at (415) 477-2410 or Steven Tindall at (510) 350-9700.

About Us

Gibbs Law Group is a California-based law firm committed to protecting the rights of clients nationwide who have been harmed by corporate misconduct. We represent individuals, whistleblowers, employees, and small businesses across the U.S. against the world’s largest corporations. Our award-winning lawyers have achieved landmark recoveries and over a billion dollars for our clients in high-stakes class action and individual cases involving consumer protection, data breach, digital privacy, and federal and California employment lawsuits. Our attorneys have received numerous honors for their work, including “Top Plaintiff Lawyers in California,” “Top Class Action Attorneys Under 40,” “Consumer Protection MVP,” “Best Lawyers in America,” and “Top Cybersecurity/ Privacy Attorneys Under 40.”
titan of plaintiffs bar award
best law firm ranking
chambers USA leading firms award
daily journal top plaintiff lawyers award

Other Lawsuits & Investigations

  1. Wells Fargo Mortgage Modification Lawsuit
  2. DoorDash Lawsuit
  3. Elmiron Lawsuit
  4. TurboTax Class Action Lawsuit
  5. Pacific Fertility Center Lawsuit
  6. California Whistleblower Attorneys
  7. California Employment Attorneys